Serenity International Dental Clinic is now Picasso Dental Clinic Learn more →
Serenity International Dental Clinic
Dental Implant Failure Rates by Brand in Vietnam: What the Data Shows
Dental Implants

Dental Implant Failure Rates by Brand in Vietnam: What the Data Shows

Dental implant failure rates by brand in Vietnam 2026. Compare Straumann, Nobel Biocare, Osstem, and Dentium survival data with clinical evidence from peer-reviewed studies.

By Dr. Emily Nguyen, DDS, Founder & Principal Dentist · · 12 min read

Last updated: April 22, 2026

When patients consider dental implants, one of the first questions they ask is: how often do they fail? It is a fair question — implants are a surgical investment, and no one wants to go through the procedure twice. The good news is that the peer-reviewed literature is extensive, and survival rates across all major brands are high. The less-known fact is that the brands used at premium clinics in Vietnam — Straumann, Nobel Biocare, Osstem, and Dentium — are the exact same brands studied in those global clinical trials.

This article breaks down what the long-term data actually shows, how failure rates differ between brands, which patient factors have the biggest influence on outcomes, and what Picasso Dental Clinic does operationally to keep our failure rates at the lower end of the published range.

Why Failure Rates Matter When Choosing a Clinic

A dental implant can fail. The global average failure rate sits between 2% and 10% depending on the study population, implant brand, surgeon experience, and follow-up period. That range is wide enough to be meaningful. A clinic using a budget, unvalidated implant system from an obscure manufacturer carries a very different risk profile than a clinic using Straumann with a 30-year clinical evidence base.

In Vietnam, reputable clinics use the same brands sold in Europe, Australia, and North America — they are not imitations or grey-market imports. Picasso Dental Clinic uses Straumann, Nobel Biocare, and Osstem sourced directly through certified regional distributors. This matters because the survival data published in peer-reviewed journals applies directly to the implants being placed in your jaw.

Understanding failure rates also helps set realistic expectations. A 98.8% ten-year survival rate sounds excellent — and it is. But it also means that roughly 1 in 83 implants placed with that brand will not survive to the ten-year mark. Knowing this helps you evaluate your own risk factors and have an honest conversation with your dentist before proceeding.

What Causes Dental Implant Failure?

Implant failures are classified as either early (within the first year) or late (after osseointegration has occurred). The causes differ significantly.

Early Failure (0–12 months)

Early failure occurs before or during osseointegration — the process by which the titanium post fuses with the surrounding bone. The most common causes include:

  • Poor surgical technique — inadequate bone preparation, overheating the bone during drilling, or incorrect implant positioning
  • Infection at placement — bacterial contamination during surgery or from an adjacent infected tooth
  • Systemic health factors — uncontrolled diabetes, immunosuppression, or bisphosphonate use
  • Smoking — nicotine reduces blood flow to the gum tissue and dramatically slows osseointegration
  • Insufficient bone density or volume — placing an implant in inadequate bone without first performing a bone graft
  • Patient non-compliance — biting hard foods or neglecting post-operative care instructions

Early failures are more preventable than late failures and are largely a function of patient selection, surgical skill, and clinic protocols.

Late Failure (12+ months)

Late failures occur after the implant has successfully osseointegrated. Common causes include:

  • Peri-implantitis — a bacterial infection of the tissue surrounding the implant, analogous to periodontitis around natural teeth. It is the leading cause of late implant failure and is strongly associated with poor oral hygiene.
  • Occlusal overload — excessive biting forces (often from bruxism) that stress the implant-bone interface over time
  • Medical changes — new-onset osteoporosis, bisphosphonate therapy, or cancer treatment affecting bone health
  • Crown or abutment failure — while the implant itself may remain stable, the prosthetic components above the gum line can fracture or debond
  • Mechanical failure — implant body fracture, though rare with modern titanium alloys

Understanding these mechanisms is important because most late failures are preventable with proper maintenance — annual check-ups, professional cleaning around implant sites, and management of bruxism.

Survival Rate Data by Brand

The following data is drawn from peer-reviewed clinical studies. “Survival” in implant research means the implant is still in place and functional — it does not necessarily mean free from all complications.

Straumann

Straumann is widely regarded as the gold standard in implant dentistry and commands the highest price point accordingly. A 2021 multicenter study published in Clinical Oral Implants Research tracking 1,248 Straumann Standard Plus implants over 10 years reported a cumulative survival rate of 98.8%. Straumann’s SLActive surface technology — which creates a hydrophilic titanium surface that accelerates osseointegration — is backed by the largest evidence base of any implant system available today.

Straumann implants are manufactured in Switzerland under ISO 13485 certification. Their BLT (Bone Level Tapered) line is particularly well-suited to immediate loading protocols, which is why Picasso Dental uses them for same-day implant cases.

Nobel Biocare

Nobel Biocare, founded by Per-Ingvar Brånemark — the scientist credited with discovering osseointegration — was the original modern dental implant system. A 2020 longitudinal study in the International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants reported a 10-year cumulative survival rate of 97.5% across Nobel Active and Replace implant lines.

Nobel Biocare has particularly strong data in full-arch rehabilitation (All-on-4 was developed using Nobel Biocare implants and their multi-unit abutment system). If you are considering All-on-4 dental implants, Nobel Biocare’s outcomes data is directly relevant.

Osstem

Osstem is South Korea’s leading implant manufacturer and the most widely used implant brand in Asia by volume. A 2019 prospective clinical study published in the Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science reported a 5-year cumulative survival rate of 96.8% for Osstem TSIII and US III implant lines across 1,104 implants.

The slightly lower figure compared to Straumann and Nobel Biocare reflects in part a shorter average follow-up period in Osstem-specific studies, not necessarily inferior product performance. Osstem implants are manufactured under CE Mark and FDA registration, and the brand has clinical evidence going back to the early 2000s. Their primary advantage is price — Osstem implants deliver strong clinical outcomes at a meaningfully lower cost than Swiss or Swedish alternatives.

Dentium

Dentium is another Korean-made implant brand with a growing evidence base. A 2018 analysis published in Implant Dentistry reported a 5-year survival rate of 96.2% across Dentium SuperLine and Implantium systems. Dentium is particularly popular in Southeast Asia and has regional clinical training centers throughout Vietnam.

Brand Comparison Table

BrandSurvival RateStudy DurationEvidence QualityPrice in Vietnam (per implant)
Straumann98.8%10 yearsVery High (multicenter RCTs)$1,200–$1,800
Nobel Biocare97.5%10 yearsVery High (multiple long-term studies)$1,000–$1,600
Osstem96.8%5 yearsHigh (prospective multicenter)$900–$1,200
Dentium96.2%5 yearsModerate (fewer multicenter trials)$800–$1,100

All prices above are for the implant fixture only. Full dental implant cost in Vietnam including crown, abutment, and surgical fees typically ranges from $900 to $1,800 total for a single tooth.

Patient Factors That Affect Implant Survival

Brand choice accounts for only part of the survival equation. Clinical research consistently shows that patient-specific factors have an equal or greater influence on outcomes than implant brand selection.

Smoking is the single strongest modifiable risk factor. Smokers have 2–3 times higher implant failure rates than non-smokers. Nicotine impairs blood supply to the periosteum, suppresses immune response, and slows bone remodeling. If you smoke, your dentist should discuss a cessation plan before proceeding with implant placement.

Uncontrolled diabetes significantly impairs osseointegration. Patients with HbA1c below 7.0 (well-controlled diabetes) have survival rates comparable to non-diabetic patients. Patients with HbA1c above 9.0 face substantially elevated risk and may not be suitable candidates until glycemic control improves.

Bone quality and quantity at the implant site directly affects initial stability. Type IV bone (soft, spongy) found more commonly in the upper posterior jaw achieves lower insertion torque and requires longer healing periods. When native bone is insufficient, bone grafting or sinus lifting is required before or concurrent with implant placement.

Oral hygiene is the primary determinant of long-term survival after osseointegration. Peri-implantitis develops in patients who do not maintain consistent oral hygiene around implant sites. Patients with a history of periodontitis are at elevated risk and require more frequent maintenance appointments.

Bruxism (teeth grinding) places cyclic overload stress on implants and their prosthetic components. Night guards are typically recommended for bruxers with implants to protect both the implant and the crown.

What Picasso Dental Does to Minimize Failure Risk

Picasso Dental Clinic has placed implants in over 62,000 patients across Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City. Our protocols are designed to address each of the preventable failure mechanisms:

Pre-surgical CBCT scanning — Every implant patient receives a cone beam CT scan before treatment. This gives our surgeons a three-dimensional view of bone density, bone volume, sinus anatomy, and nerve location. We do not place implants based on 2D X-rays alone.

Guided implant surgery — We use digital planning software to design the optimal implant position, depth, and angulation before the patient enters the chair. Surgical guides translate this plan into precise intraoperative execution, reducing placement error.

Strict patient selection — We decline or defer implant placement in patients whose systemic health or risk factors indicate high failure probability until those factors are addressed. This includes smokers who have not committed to cessation, patients with poorly controlled diabetes, and patients who require bone augmentation that has not yet healed.

Premium bone grafting materials — When bone volume is insufficient, we use Bio-Oss xenograft (bovine-derived hydroxyapatite) and resorbable collagen membranes — materials with the strongest evidence base for guided bone regeneration.

Structured maintenance protocol — Every implant patient is enrolled in a recall schedule with professional cleaning around implant sites at 6-month intervals. We monitor probing depths and take annual radiographs to detect early peri-implantitis before it progresses.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the overall failure rate of dental implants in Vietnam? A: At reputable clinics using premium brands (Straumann, Nobel Biocare, Osstem), failure rates in Vietnam are comparable to global benchmarks — typically 1.2% to 3.2% over ten years. Clinics using unvalidated or budget implant systems carry meaningfully higher risk.

Q: Is Osstem as good as Straumann? A: Both are clinically validated systems with strong evidence bases. Straumann has longer-term studies and marginally higher reported survival rates, but Osstem delivers excellent outcomes at a lower price point. The choice depends on your budget, risk profile, and the specific clinical scenario. Your dentist should recommend the most appropriate system for your case.

Q: Can a failed implant be replaced? A: Yes, in most cases. After a failed implant is removed, the site is allowed to heal — typically 3–6 months. If bone loss occurred, a bone graft may be needed before re-implantation. Most patients who experience early failure can successfully receive a replacement implant.

Q: Does implant brand affect the crown on top? A: Indirectly, yes. Each implant brand has a proprietary connection geometry, so the crown and abutment must be compatible with the specific implant platform used. This is one reason why it is important to receive follow-up care at a clinic that has access to spare parts for your specific brand.

Q: How do I know which brand my implant is? A: Picasso Dental provides every patient with an implant passport — a document recording the brand, model, lot number, and placement date of each implant. Keep this document; you will need it for future dental care anywhere in the world.

Q: Does smoking before the implant (but quitting after) still affect outcomes? A: Former smokers who quit before surgery have significantly better outcomes than current smokers, though slightly worse outcomes than lifetime non-smokers. Quitting at least 8 weeks before implant placement and maintaining cessation through the osseointegration period (3–6 months) is the recommended protocol.

Q: What is the most common cause of implant failure in Vietnam? A: Based on clinical data across the region, peri-implantitis (bacterial infection of tissue around the implant) is the leading cause of late-stage failure. This is a maintenance issue more than a brand or surgical issue — consistent oral hygiene and professional cleaning prevent most cases.

Q: Is there a guarantee if an implant fails at Picasso Dental? A: Yes. Picasso Dental offers a structured guarantee program that covers implant re-placement in the event of osseointegration failure. Terms and conditions apply based on the patient’s compliance with post-operative instructions and attendance at scheduled recall visits. Ask your treatment coordinator for details before commencing treatment.

verified

Medically reviewed by Dr. Emily Nguyen, DDS, Founder & Principal Dentist

Founder & Principal Dentist of Picasso Dental Clinic. Over 15 years of experience in implant dentistry, cosmetic dentistry, and full-mouth rehabilitation. Read full bio

Last reviewed: April 22, 2026

Book Consultation phone Call Now
mail phone